by Peter Hill (Music 784.18 Str)
Spring has sprung, and I often
think of Stravinsky’s “Rite of Spring” around this time of year. Just as spring
is a time for new growth, Stravinsky’s “Rite of Spring” seems in retrospect to
be a signpost in music history, heralding the age of Modernism for the
concert-going public. And like a spring storm, things got off to a rough start:
there was a bit of a riot at the debut performance of the piece.
To be fair, Schoenberg and his
circle beat Stravinsky to the concert-as-riot routine by a few months. The
now-infamous “Skandalkonzert” took place in Vienna on March 31, 1913, featuring
performances of pieces by Schoenberg, Webern, Berg, and Zemlinsky. Mahler’s
“Kindertotenlieder” was also on the bill, but fights broke out within the
audience during the performance of Berg’s “Five Orchestral Songs,” and the show
ended prematurely. The Berg pieces weren’t performed again publicly until 1952,
incredibly enough.
But the riot at the debut of
Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring on May 29, 1913 developed a legendary reputation
all its own. This was his third ballet commission, following The Firebird and
Petroushka, and it’s likely that the audience was just as taken aback by
Nijinsky’s choreography for the dancers as they were by the unique modern
sounds of the music. There was laughter and shouting coming from the audience
throughout the first performance. Some accounts of this performance have been
embellished over time, and perhaps led certain expectations at avant-garde
performances of the era. I immediately think of the Dada artists during their
formative period, working out of the Cabaret Voltaire in Zurich. Dada (anti-)
founder Tristan Tzara pushed a large audience of around 1000 to their limits in
April of 1919, purposely antagonizing them toward rioting and destruction,
which Tzara considered a smashing success, pardon the pun, as it transformed
the audience from being mere onlookers to being active participants.
The legend around the debut
performance of the Rite of Spring still looms large, but the real story of the
piece is one of adoration. Even most folks at the time of the piece’s debut
felt this way: it’s not as widely discussed, but there were five more
performances of the work in its first month, and the rest were very well
received. No riots on those nights. And it’s gone on to be a much beloved
piece, sometimes referred to as the most loved or at least most well-known
piece of 20th Century classical music.
Here in Polley, we have a book
called “Stravinsky: the rite of spring” by Peter Hill, and it’s a great
introduction to the piece from conception to its place in modern concert and
recording repertoire today. This is a book that you’ll get maximum benefit from
if you read music, but there’s still lots of useful and fascinating information
for those who don’t. For example, one of the early chapters is called
“Sketches,” and explores the handwritten sketches Stravinsky made toward the
Rite of Spring between 1911 and 1913. There’s some great musical analysis here
of how the piece gradually took shape from the dated sketches, but you can
follow a lot of this by simply reading and listening, as Hill makes references
to familiar parts of the final version. This is followed by a chapter on the
earliest performances of the piece and reactions to it, including informal
performances at the piano by Stravinsky, again at the piano in a 4-hand reduction
played by Stravinsky and Debussy, at the rehearsals with the orchestra, the
dress rehearsal, and that fabled first public performance itself.
Following chapters delve further
into analyzing the structures and themes of the final piece, followed by a very
cool section that highlights historical commentaries made about the Rite by
various composers, musicians and critics. Here we find that the piece has been
generally well received despite its difficulties, with comments ranging from
around the time of its debut all the way to recollections from the late 1970s.
Final sections of the book cover the topics of how Stravinsky and Nijinsky collaborated on the choreography—or perhaps more to the point, how they didn’t, and how Stravinsky had some reservations about the initial staging of the piece—followed by some thoughtful comparisons between notable commercial recordings. Hill points out that The Rite of Spring happened to debut the same year as the first complete recording of a major symphony was made (Beethoven’s 5th), so it’s grown up alongside the recording industry. As one of the most frequently recorded pieces by orchestras wanting to strut their virtuosic stuff, there are lots of interesting tempo variations among respected recordings of the Rite—even those conducted by Stravinsky himself. Hill breaks down many of these differences, how they change the character and feel of the piece, and at times how Stravinsky himself reflected on the recordings.
[If you enjoy this, you may also wish to try Stravinsky: A Creative Spring: Russia and France, 1882-1934 and Stravinsky: The Second Exile: France and America, 1934-1971 both by Stephen Walsh.]
[
publisher’s official Stravinsky: The Rite of Spring web page ]
| [ official Peter Hill web site ]
Recommended
by Scott
S.
Bennett Martin Public Library — Polley Music Library
Have you read or listened to
this one? What did you think? Did you find this review helpful?
New reviews appear every month on the Staff
Recommendations page of the BookGuide website. You can visit that
page to see them all, or watch them appear here in the BookGuide Blog
individually over the course of the entire month. Click the tag for the
reviewer's name to see more of this reviewer’s recommendations!
Check out this, and all the other great music resources, at the Polley Music Library, located on the 2nd floor of the Bennett Martin Public Library at 14th & "N" St. in downtown Lincoln. You'll find biographies of musicians, books about music history, instructional books, sheet music, CDs, music-related magazines, and much more. Also check out Polley Music Library Picks, the Polley Music Library's e-mail newsletter, and follow them on Facebook!
No comments:
Post a Comment